---
# Destinations of 'baby boomer' migrants in the metropolitan U.S.
Source: The Washington Post
---
## The 'back to the city' hypothesis
<style>
h3 {
font-size: 1.5em;
}
body {
font-size: 1.5em;
}
p, ul, li {
font-size: 100% !important;
}
</style>
<img src=assets/img/boomers.jpg style="width: 750px">
<span class="footnote">Source: *The Washington Post*</span>
Image source: Plane, D., and Jurjevich, J. (2009). "Ties That No Longer Bind? The Patterns and Repercussions of Age-Articulated Migration." The Professional Geographer 61(1), 4-20.
---
## 'Baby boomer' migration
* General findings: migrants tend to move "down the urban hierarchy" to smaller cities as they age (Plane et al. 2005; Plane and Jurjevich 2009)
<img src=assets/img/plane.PNG style="width: 700px">
<span class="footnote">Image source: Plane, D., and Jurjevich, J. (2009). "Ties That No Longer Bind? The Patterns and Repercussions of Age-Articulated Migration." *The Professional Geographer* 61(1), 4-20.
Central question: how to reconcile conflicts between anecdotes around boomer migration & scholarly literature?
Topics to cover:
---
## Research questions
* Central question: how to reconcile conflicts between anecdotes around boomer migration & scholarly literature?
* Topics to cover:
* Geography of boomer growth & decline in U.S. metropolitan areas
* Analysis of metropolitan boomer migrants' destinations
Data sources:
---
## Methods
* Exploratory data analysis of demographic & migration trends of baby boomers since 2000
Data sources:
* Census tract-level data on baby boomers from 2000 and 2010 Censuses
* Microdata on baby boomer migrants from 2005-2011 ACS PUMS
Top gainers: Phoenix, Las Vegas, Tampa-St. Petersburg, Orlando, San Antonio
Top losers: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco/Oakland, Detroit
---
## Boomer gains and losses, by metro (2000s)
* Most large metropolitan areas lost baby boomers during the 2000s
Top gainers: Phoenix, Las Vegas, Tampa-St. Petersburg, Orlando, San Antonio
Top losers: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco/Oakland, Detroit
---
## Tampa, FL
<iframe width='100%' height='550px' frameBorder='0' src='http://a.tiles.mapbox.com/v3/kwalkertcu.ho5moc3c/attribution,zoompan,zoomwheel,legend.html'></iframe>
---
## Chicago, IL
<img src=assets/img/chicago.png style="width: 800px">
---
## Chicago, IL
<iframe width='100%' height='550px' frameBorder='0' src='http://a.tiles.mapbox.com/v3/kwalkertcu.hoa73505/attribution,zoompan,zoomwheel,legend.html'></iframe>
Question: who is moving to city cores?
---
## Population trends, 2000-2010
* Overall: boomer population losses in closer-in neighborhoods, growth on urban fringes
* Significant growth in select inner-core neighborhoods
Question: who is moving to city cores?
---
## Migration trends by age group
<img src=assets/img/genplot.png style="width: 800px">
---
## Boomer migration by education
<img src=assets/img/educbar.png style="width: 800px">
---
## Boomer migration by income
<img src=assets/img/incbar.png style="width: 800px">
Further research:
---
## Conclusions and future directions
* Overall, most growth in baby boomer populations occurs away from urban cores
* Growth taking place around downtowns of major cities; higher proportion of inner-core migrants have very high, very low levels of education, income
Further research:
* Where are inner-core boomer migrants moving from?
* How do characteristics like education, income, etc. influence moves up and down the urban hierarchy?
Presentation available on GitHub
---
## Contact
* Email: <kyle.walker@tcu.edu>
* Twitter: [@kyle_e_walker](https://twitter.com/kyle_e_walker)
Presentation available on GitHub
* Link: http://walkerke.github.io/aag2014
* Code: https://github.com/walkerke/aag2014
Table of Contents | t |
---|---|
Exposé | ESC |
Full screen slides | e |
Presenter View | p |
Source Files | s |
Slide Numbers | n |
Toggle screen blanking | b |
Show/hide slide context | c |
Notes | 2 |
Help | h |